Two Minute Megaphone

Students, safety and sharing

We can’t engage our students if we don’t let them teach us who they are and what they value in their own words. Often we can bring our own societal perspectives and preconceptions into the classroom. Strong student voice can lead the way to better relationships and better education.

What do you think of immediately when you hear the name of my home, “Chicago”? Michael Jordan and Al Capone? Pizza and Chiraq?

The visible violence in our communities often grabs the spotlight as it robs us of so many wonderful people and robs so many Chicagoans, especially youth, of their lives. It is vitally important to acknowledge this violence and address it, yet too often the mainstream narrative focuses on young people’s deaths and never remembers to honor their lives.
In the midst of this media frenzy on the violence, young people are courageously making their own voices heard. On Saturday, the youth from Urban Gateways held their annual film screening. Urban Gateways is a program for high need Chicago youth to study social issues and technical filming techniques to create their own films. How do you feel watching the world through their eyes?


tmm1
Michael Coleman shows his love for our Southwest side neighborhood here.

tmm2
Antwon Funches shares a new lens on history here.

tmm4
My own student Stephanie Alvardo considers how Latina Americans view their own beauty here.

tmm3
And Mariah Starks portrays the power of the unapologetic Black here.

final
You can see the whole collection here.

In Sunday’s Chicago Tribune, a group of fifth graders published an opinion column “This is Us” that lovingly critiques the hurtful stereotypes that they face in the media while shining with love for their neighborhood and community. “This isn’t Chi-raq. This is home.” They conclude.

Finally, youth—including several of my own students—gathered from around Chicago at Roosevelt University to share their personal stories of brutality at the hands of the police. The stories they shared are heartbreaking, but the voicing of that experience can help change the culture of police violence and improve things for others.

Through these three examples, you can see three ways that I support the growth of student voice in my own classroom. First, the development of their own voices through visual arts. Second, the development of writing skills to tell their own stories. And finally, the courage and preparation to present their perspectives in a public forum.

What are your reflections on these students’ work?
What strategies do you use in your own classroom to nourish student voice?
What specific ways have your students used their voices to impact your shared community?
What support would you like to help you develop a safe and vibrant space for student voices?

Please take a couple of minutes to share your answers to these questions or other questions and insights you have around student voice via the comments section below or by emailing me directly at xbarrett@vivalistens.org.

Josh Agpalza

In July 2014, our staff sat down with Josh Agpalza, a Cambridge World History and AVID (Advancement Via Individual Determination) teacher at Federal Way High School in Federal Way, Washington, to see where his leadership journey had taken him since participating in the NEA VIVA Idea Exchange last spring.  Josh helped to author Teacher Voices for Education Reform: Making the Most of Time in School, and now serves as a national representative for the NEA.  Here’s what Josh had to say.

Q: What are you most passionate about?

A: My role as an educator, and fighting for social justice.

I know the issue of time in school is a social justice issue.  It’s not our students’ fault that they weren’t born in to a privileged family that has a chance to send their kids to preschool or summer camp.  Those students who don’t have those opportunities (for lots of reasons) are behind.

All students need the same access to education, and I’ve seen first-hand how some kids have access while others don’t.  Example:  I did a year-long student teaching at University High School in Spokane WA.  It’s an affluent, homogenous, population — 60% free and reduced lunch, but overall an affluent community.  Then I moved to Federal Way and saw a lot less privilege: students were behind in reading and writing, elementary kids living in motels, and little access or resources to do enrichment.

Q: What inspires and motivates you? 

A: The stories of the students is what drives me. Our school is an AVID (Advancement Via Individual Determination) demonstration school.  Over 300 students participate in AVID at my school, and most of them have background stories of struggle.  Example – One of the students I teach lives in a house with 22 other kids and 7 adults.  Yet he was able to get scholarships and grants, maintaining a 3.4GPA in that environment. We don’t just talk about struggles, but we focus on their lives in general.  “What’s your purpose here? What do you want to contribute to the world?”  You take their struggles as motivation to move forward in life.  I tell them, you do go good for yourself so you can do better for your family.

All 16 of my AVID students are first in their families to graduate. 100% of them got accepted into 4-year university (16 students) and collectively they received over $400K in scholarship awards.

Q:  You played a leadership role during the VIVA Idea Exchange.  What kinds of leadership opportunities have you been a part of since then?

A: I remember that email (inviting Josh to be on the Writing Collaborative) and thinking I wanted to do something. I’ll just do it.  When it was over, it motivated me to talk to one of our building reps who also happens to be the Vice President of the Federal Way Educators Association.  I told him about it and he told me to run as a rep at the national level.  Now I’m an NEA Rep, and just returned from the national meeting.  I went to NEA and met so many great people.  This gave me more motivation.  It’s not just me in my building who is fighting for education.  I was learning the whole time.  My intention was to immerse myself, take any opportunity I could to learn. I joined the Asian Pacific American Caucus.  Learned the issues they were talking about and fighting for.

At the AVID Summer Institute earlier this month I spoke to a close friend about how other teachers are becoming more involved.  One of the reasons why is because I was so excited by the VIVA Project that I was sharing that with my colleagues.  I presented about it at a staff meeting.  Now a lot of younger teachers are becoming more involved.  My role is to help motivate others to be proactive in what we do.  Everything we do will affect students.  If we decide to just sit and not lead, then the stuff that comes form the top down will affect our students, and affect us.  Top-down mandates breed complacency.  WE have to have our voice in the realm of education.  Those who study it, breathe it, and live it, know what’s best for students.

Thank you, New Voice Strategies.  Because of you and the organization you are a part of it gives me so much energy to keep going.  I have more reasons to fight for my students.  I see my students fighting every day, which gives me more energy to keep fighting for what’s best for students.

Actions Speak Louder

By Jennifer Reinhardt

After reading Rick Hess’ recent blog post “10 School Reform Phrases That Should Trigger Your BS Detector,” I’ve been thinking a lot about authenticity versus jargon and what exactly we mean when we say “teacher leadership” or “teacher voice” within our own organization. How do we distinguish ourselves from the “sugarplum visions fueled by hot air” that Hess cautions against in his post?

In an arena where decision-making can be contentious and divisive, New Voice Strategies develops insight into education policy by tapping into the collective wisdom of the people most intimately involved: teachers themselves. Our VIVA Idea Exchange™ process both elevates professional voices and promotes collaboration between teachers, parents, administration, and elected officials.

But there I go again using “collaboration,” another word Hess flags as a fatuous phrase! Is it that hard to describe our process without sounding trite or like Charlie Brown’s teacher talking in the Peanuts cartoon?

I believe that our work can withstand the “Hess test” on vapid vocabulary because our process is thoughtful, deliberative, and shaped by our members. This summer, we launched the VIVA Leadership Council with a mission “to create pathways for mobilizing action at a grassroots level to effect change in the educational system.” A pretty lofty goal, but achievable through both the passion of our teacher leaders and their work within four distinct action cohorts: Research, Communications, Programs, and Opportunities.

With our members defining the vision and objectives of each cohort, they will help our organization prioritize areas of interest and affirm that we are heading in a direction guided by teachers. For example, in a recent conversation about creating a searchable database of report recommendations, teacher-led research studies, and curriculum guides on our website, our members suggested that we also include a portal for upcoming PD trainings where teachers could submit, review and share content, as well as be reminded about registration deadlines.

So many times, organizations profess to know what is “best” for teachers and create programs or policy based upon this internal script. Sometimes “collaboration” is as simple as asking teachers what they want for themselves and then listening to their advice. We’ve created a system where “teacher voice” doesn’t mean “rent-a-teacher,” and “teacher leadership” is supported with multiple entry-points for ongoing engagement and skills cultivation. In these ways actions speak louder than words, and also give substance to jargon.

jennJennifer Reinhardt is New Voice Strategies’ Engagement Program Manager. She works through the VIVA Leadership Center to design, implement and lead strategic campaigns around practitioner-identified issues.

Parents Beware! Of Unnecessary, Invalid and Unreliable Test Scores

By Judy Smizik

Are all of the tests our children taking at school necessary? Are the results valid and reliable? Should our kindergartners be assessed on reading skills? Our tests today reflect the Common Core State Standards, but are the standards developmentally appropriate? These are questions parents need to ponder when reviewing their children’s test results. They also need to ask themselves if all these tests are necessary. Are they depriving their children of valuable instruction time, as well as other vital educational components such as play, recess and creativity?

As a teacher, parent, and grandparent, my answer to that last question is, “yes.” There is no research that says five-year-olds need to read. Yet, the tests used at the beginning, middle and end of kindergarten require children to do just that. I have had many students reading in kindergarten, but these children were developmentally ready to read. Reading was encouraged, but not forced. Years ago, tests were not required at all in kindergarten. Kindergarten was once a blooming garden where children could play, socialize, create, imagine, explore, and develop skills at an individual pace.

Because of the rigorous standards of today, kindergarten is now a place where students are required to sit for long periods of time, pay attention, and perform tasks that were once considered first grade skills. Kindergarten teachers are forced to administer a plethora of individual and group tests throughout the year. Most teachers, through classroom observation and progress monitoring charts, know their students’ strengths and weaknesses without the need for standardized testing. Have you ever tried to give the DIBLES (a mandated individual test in most states) while monitoring a classroom of 25 other kindergarten students? Did the DIBLES tell you anything more than what you already knew about the students? The answer is, “no!” So why give them?

The overuse of tests has caused many students to give up. Some of our students are late bloomers and need a little more time to develop. Some have learning difficulties. Are all these tests helping them overcome their learning challenges, or are they creating anxiety, stress, and feelings of failure? Overuse of testing begins in kindergarten and continues throughout the student’s schooling. Last week, I was asked to assess a student’s readiness for second grade. When I pulled out my stopwatch, the child responded with a look of trepidation on his face. “Do you have to time me?” he pleaded. “Just this once, “I promised.

When designing this student’s individual education plan, I needed first to help him overcome his fear of making mistakes when reading and let him see he can be successful. All the testing he has experienced has had a detrimental effect on him.

This student is not alone. I have witnessed numerous children cringe when the teachers announced it was time for a test. I have seen others who have just given up and put their heads down on their desks.

What can parents do to help eliminate the overuse of testing? In Pittsburgh and other places, a group of parents and teachers are asking parents to “opt out of the testing.” Parents need to put in writing that they do not want their children taking standardized tests. Because teachers are forced to teach to the test, test results are not reliable. Teaching to the test narrows the content of the curriculum, denying students a comprehensive education. It also makes the results questionable.

Parents need to demand we go back to a developmentally appropriate curriculum, where students are encouraged to take risks, be creative, imagine, problem solve, and think critically. They need to have time to socialize and play when they are in younger grades. Too much testing is depriving them of the experiences they need to become well-rounded individuals. If a student is experiencing academic difficulty, he should be given the gift of time to develop his skills in a stress-free learning environment that accommodates his academic needs. It is not the time to put more unnecessary stress on a student who is already feeling inadequate.

It’s time to eliminate the overuse of tests and focus on the real needs of our children. We need real educators with real practical experience to establish educational policy. The Common Core State Standards need to be revisited, and a new direction in the best interest of all students needs to be taken. Our children are our future.

Judy_SmizikJudy Smizik is an educator with over 35 years of experience. She is a  former President of the Pittsburgh Association of Kindergarten Teacher and a member of Delta Kappa Gamma, an International Educational Society.  Presently, she mentors new teachers, provides professional development workshops, and has a private practice.

Marshall Middle School teacher delves into world of public policy

By Chuck Carlson

It started with an email. Where it ends? Even Lesley Hagelgans isn’t quite sure.

But the Marshall Middle School eighth grade teacher does know this: She’s going to enjoy the ride and do what she can to help change the dialogue and, perhaps, the direction of public education.

“I’m a teacher, a mom and a writer,” Hagelgans said. “Writing has taken me to Washington, D.C. twice, New Orleans and New York City. I’ve gotten to see people around the country and meet people I never thought I would have met.”

She has found herself deep in the often complex, sometimes frustrating world of public policy. In fact earlier this month, she was in Denver with nine other educators from across the country in the National Education Association “Raise Your Hand: Empowered Educators” representing Vision Ideas Voice Action, a teacher-empowerment group.

She has become a powerful local voice in teacher evaluations and in the national VIVA program and she has met with U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan to voice her ideas and suggestions.

“It’s very fulfilling,” she said.

And it all started with a single email.

In fact, it was an email blast that came from Marshall school superintendent Randy Davis, by way of a school board member, and it asked the generic question, “If you had $3.94 billion to spend on public education, how would you spend it?”

The number was not random — it was the amount the federal government currently spends on professional development in education — and the question intrigued Hagelgans, who teaches language arts and is the school’s yearbook adviser.

“I was just going to spend 15 minutes on the computer looking into it and I was there two hours,” she said. “I was sucked in. And when I was in Denver, the other teachers all said the same thing.”

That initial foray was a little more than three years ago and since then, she has become an advocate for VIVA Teachers and the launching of its Idea Exchange, a three-step process developed by New Voice Strategies to increase participation in public policy.

The plan is to begin an online conversation and then bring those who are truly interested into a room to discuss recommendations for teacher accountability, teacher support and more.

Those recommendations made their way to Duncan’s office and he met with a group of teachers, including Hagelgans, in D.C.

He discussed some of the proposals and seemed non-committal, she said, but six months later, he introduced the “Race to the Top” program, the Education Department’s $4 billion contest created to spur innovation and reforms in state and local public education.

She has also found herself in groups discussing public education and funding with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which over the years has donated millions to education.

“It’s taken on a life of its own,” she said. “It’s so cool.”

It was never supposed to be this way for Hagelgans, who while growing up in central and southern Illinois, figured she’d eventually do something with what she knew best — math.

“We moved down to Carterville, Ill. and it was a small town, but kind of cliquey, something like Marshall, though no disrespect to Marshall,” she said. “I had a teacher named Connie Church and all the cliquey groups fell away. She said everyone has a voice and she didn’t care about your past. For the first time I felt like I belonged in a small town.”

Hagelgans had Church as a teacher for three classes by her senior year but in October of her senior year, Church, her husband, her sister, her sister-in- law and two others died in a horrific traffic accident.

“We had to do something so we all went to her house,” Hagelgans said. “She brought us together when she was alive and she brought us together in death. But she pushed me in language arts. It just opened up for me. She gave me the push I needed.”

She also provided the template for Hagelgans, who decided to make her life’s work teaching.

She went to Western Michigan University, earning a bachelor’s degree in English and political science and a master’s in middle school teaching.

She heard about an opening at Marshall Middle School and, 15 minutes into the interview, was hired. She’s been there ever since and she has made it a point to teach the way Mrs. Church did, making every kid feel comfortable.

“I want to give kids that sense of community,” said Hagelgans, who turns 38 this week and lives in Union City with her husband Michael and their two kids, Damen, 9, and Delilah, 6, who both attend Hughes Elementary.

She continues working with educators around the country in VIVA Teachers as well as writing about public policy and the role of public education today.

“It’s like being a doctor,” she said. “You make a diagnosis of students and get a prescription for how to make them better.”

 

Originally posted Jul. 13, 2014 by the Battle Creek Enquirer http://ow.ly/zeok4 

Let’s Fix Inequality in Public Education

By Allan Fluharty

A central tenant of education is to prepare students to participate in a democratic society. We want them to value a diversity of thought and culture, as well as a commitment to equity and justice. Unfortunately, I do not see equality and justice in public education in Illinois on several levels.

Families raising children in Chicago are faced with tough educational choices, decisions that have life-changing impact on their kids. One is to stay in the city or move to a suburban district with well-funded schools. There is a vast difference between city, suburban, and rural schools in Illinois, in funding and educational outcomes. Most families who can afford it move.

Funding public education in Illinois is based on property taxes, which has created a dysfunctional system that favors the students who are lucky enough to live in well-to-do communities. Public education in Illinois is not progressive; it does not provide an equal education for all of our citizens.

In the Chicago, there are also great differences between schools. Some families send their children to private or parochial schools; however, most parents don’t have the means to pay both for taxes and tuition. Many families live in areas of Chicago with fine CPS schools, but other families don’t. Over the last 25 years, public education in Chicago evolved into a potpourri of options with magnet, select enrollment and neighborhood schools, both at the elementary and high school levels. There are also numerous charter school operations, some large and politically connected—who operate semi-autonomous schools with public funding. The “best” schools—those with the most successful results and highest funding, are the magnet and certain charter schools. Competition to enter the best schools is intense, involving a combination of grades, standardized test scores, and a lottery. Parents with students in CPS hope their children will have the grades and the luck to get into a magnet or a good charter school.

Incredibly, the separation and categorization of students also occurs inside schools, where students are placed, or “tracked,” into regular, honors, AP, and IB classes. IB classes are particularly divisive, creating a “school within a school” that splits the student body and the faculty into separate cliques. An after effect of splitting out the best students is that  “reluctant learners” are concentrated into lower level classes whose teachers must focus on social/emotional issues—such as tardiness, absent students, poor behaviors, and so on—at the expense of academic learning. It is typical that novice teachers are assigned to these challenging classes—teachers with the least experience handle the most challenging students.

Public schools in Illinois are divided by affluence, grades, behavior, and social-economic status. Perhaps the best gift a parent can give to their children is to live within the boundaries of well-off school districts. CPS separates children into neighborhood, select enrollment, magnet, and charter schools. Families pray that their children win the ‘educational lottery’ and get into the best schools. This separation continues with a vengeance within most schools through tracking and now school-within-school programs.

Enough is enough! Separating students based on class and ability is not done in public school systems of other industrialized nations as now practiced in the United States. More equitable systems in Europe, Asia, and North America—Finland, Singapore, and Canada, for example—are outpacing the U.S. by wide margins. Public education in the U.S. needs get back on track. It is time to put the “public” back into public education and introduce equity as a key provision.

Parents need to vote for politicians and policies that support the ideals of progressive education, in particular the ideal of educational equity.

Allan-FluhartyVIVA Teacher Allan Fluharty is a National Board Certified high school science teacher for the Chicago Public Schools. 

Design for Safety

By Mark Anderson

We talk a lot about the physical design of schools on this blog, as we know that the physical environment can have a great impact on learning. In this article on CNN from Paul Caron from last year on designing schools for safety in the wake of the Sandy Hook shootings, here’s some principles of school design that are worth exploring.

Layers of hurdles can be designed for unwanted visitors, with corridors, entries and exits that are still clearly visible to teachers, said Robert Ducibella, a member of the Sandy Hook commission and founding principal of DVS Security Consulting and Engineering.

Adding transparent buffering allows time for visitors to be assessed. If we consider this design feature from the standpoint of aesthetics, not only safety, we could also consider how entryways can be used to transition visitors from the external community into the school community in a manner that communicates what the school is about. For example, there might be a series of switchbacks leading up to the school doors that could be adorned with plantings made by the students, or a short hallway before the entryway that depicts pictures and artwork made by the students.

Some security features can improve everyday life in schools. Adding doors that connect classrooms can make it easier for teachers to work as teams, and in a dangerous situation, makes it easier for them to move students to safer areas.

Glassed hallways allow teachers and other adults in the schools to see an intruder but also to combat problems such as bullying.

Visibility and connectability are important design features in a school. Open space design has been tried and rejected in education and now in many offices as too distracting, but having the option to both open up and close off spaces is important. Design that allows for this level of flexibility and control would be much appreciated by teachers so that they can collaborate in bigger or small groups as necessary without the acoustic and visual distractions of an open space.

Visibility is highly critical in a school not only for safety, but furthermore when we consider the importance of allowing natural light into a building. All too often schools feel like enclosed dungeons rather than like spaces we’d want our children to grow in and spend the majority of their day within.

The topic of physical infrastructure of schools isn’t a sexy topic, and it’s not written or discussed much in the media on education, yet it is clear that it is a critical consideration in education not only for its impact on learning, but furthermore for safety. As the article notes:

But it often takes a local tragedy to make security a priority. Security experts said lawmakers need to make safety upgrades mandatory, as they have in other areas.

It’s terrible to say, but America is built around response management,” said Ducibella, the Sandy Hook commission member. “In most states in the country, we don’t have a perfect security criteria document for school design, which the Sandy Hook commission is looking at. We don’t have uniform criteria that is legislatively enforceable.”

This is unfortunately true. But given that we tend to ignore the impact of the physical environment of schools on learning, I wonder how long the tragedy of decrepit schools must be inflicted on our children before we realize that how we design our schools reflects how we value our future?

Mark-Anderson-150-Mark Anderson is a 7th and 8th grade Special Education teacher in the Bronx.

 

 

This blog was originally posted on http://schoolecosystem.wordpress.com on July 6, 2014

VIVA Teachers Share Habits of Innovative Educators

By Tina Nolan, National Leadership Development Director

 The truth is, innovation is like your health. If you treat it like a fad diet, you’ll get frustrated and exhausted. If you develop good habits, the results will engage your students like you’ve never seen before.

This summer, New Voice Strategies is taking part in launching its first online course, and placing teachers at the center of leading change in schools. Developed by TedX speaker Courtney O’Connell, 5 Habits of Innovative Educators is an online class to uncover the habits of what she calls “disruptive educators,” individuals who are working to change the education system from within.

New Voice Strategies invites all VIVA Teachers to participate in this exciting experiment. You can register online at http://bit.ly/5habits_NVS.

The foundation of the course is a series of six video lectures from Courtney. Those are complemented by guest lectures from innovators in and outside of education, case studies written by innovative educators — including four of our very own VIVA Teachers — and two live Q&A sessions. As a participant in this course, you will receive access to more than 24 lectures and 3.5 hours of content! Use this link to save $20 (an exclusive rate just for New Voice Strategies): http://bit.ly/5habits_NVS

The participating VIVA Teachers are Joshua Agpalza (VIVA NEA – Time in School), Laura Hirschfield (VIVA NEA – Safety), Katie Morosky (VIVA NEA – Safety), and Jim Szewc (VIVA MET). In their case examples, they share how educators can disrupt the status quo without adding any money to their budgets or time to their day.

Want to know more? 

Here’s a blog Courtney wrote about the course to explain some of the “unknown” perks about the course: http://www.courtoconnell.com/follow-big-ideas-conference-back-time-virtual/

Here’s a short video explaining the course: http://youtu.be/vhLjlePB-yo

 

Special New Voice Strategies Coupon Code:

Share this link with your email list and on your social media channels to make sure your teacher colleagues save $20: http://bit.ly/5habits_NVS

 

 

 

Small Steps Will Save Kids Lives

By Katherine Doerr Morosky

December 14, 2012, is in my, and perhaps all of America’s, pantheon of “days that will live in infamy”. Almost every moment of that day — when 20 of my daughter’s peers and seven of her teachers’ colleagues were massacred at Sandy Hook Elementary School, one mile from our home — is etched in my brain like a nightmare that has no end. My family and I cope with our intense pain by lending our voices to the struggle for gun violence prevention. Trips to Hartford and Washington D.C., are practically a monthly occurrence. I cold-call senators and representatives, dash off letters to the editor in less than an hour, and tweet in my sleep.  Newtown was supposed to be a tipping point. So many of us gave it our all: President Obama and Vice-President Biden, the devastated parents of murdered children, and even my daughter, who walked the halls of the Congressional Office Building to show our elected officials just how small a six-year-old really is.

Shockingly, a few cowardly politicians, beholden to the corporate gun lobby and its extremist mouthpiece, the NRA, blocked a vote on universal background checks for gun purchases. What has their perversion done to innocent children across this country? According to Everytown for Gun Safety, in the one and a half years since the Sandy Hook tragedy in Newtown, 74 school shootings have occurred and nearly 50,000 Americans have been killed by guns. The toll that gun violence takes on Americans is an escalating crisis.

Not all politicians are craven, and progress has been made at the state level. For example, Connecticut state legislators bravely worked in a bipartisan fashion last spring to strengthen laws that will make my state safer, including a limit on the size of ammunition magazines, restrictions on military-style assault weapons, and universal background checks. Although all American children deserve these same safeguards to be federal law, progress is going to be incremental.

The intersection of domestic violence and gun violence is an area where several federal bills have recently been introduced.

KMOROSKYThe author, Katie Morosky (right), meeting with U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and staff on June 18, 2014.  Sen. Blumenthal is the author of the Lori Jackson Domestic Violence Survivor Protection Act.

One in particular is meaningful to me. It honors a Connecticut woman who was shot and killed by her violent husband after she received a temporary restraining order. Because the law allowed him to possess a gun before the order became permanent, this dangerous person was able to kill his wife with a legal weapon! The Lori Jackson Domestic Violence Survivor Protection Act will compel domestic abusers who are subject to temporary restraining orders to temporarily surrender firearms they possess, and bar them from purchasing firearms for the duration of the temporary order. This important law will protect women and children in abusive relationships when they are most in danger. In fact, 57% of mass shootings involve the murder of a close family member.

Of course, the Lori Jackson bill and other laws designed to protect vulnerable women from gun violence can work best when the United States passes universal background checks for all gun purchases. In states like Connecticut that require background checks on all handgun sales, 38 percent fewer women are shot to death by their partners than in states with no background checks. Would the Lori Jackson bill have made a difference at Sandy Hook Elementary School on December 14, 2014.  Perhaps not, but every small step in the right direction creates positive momentum. The difference to me as an educator and mother is this:  the bill will have a real impact on the lives of countless children who live in homes where the intersection of domestic and gun violence is potentially lethal to them, their loved ones, and to their communities.

KMorosky-150x150

Katherine Doerr Morosky teaches science at Wilton High School in Wilton, Conn. She participated in the VIVA NEA Writing Collaborative on school safety.

Race, Class, and Justice in Education- it all comes down to trust

By Annie Tan

When I started the process of becoming a teacher, I was idealistic. I was going to be Ms. Sheridan, my first-grade teacher, who made me feel confident for the first time. Or, I was going to be my second-grade teacher Mrs. Yee, who sat with me through lunch periods to work on my handwriting. I was excited. I was going to incorporate social justice into my teaching, and make sure everyone was heard! Yes! Then I started teaching.

As any teacher can tell you, it has been exhausting. It’s not just from preparing for and teaching my students who have autism, cognitive delays, and developmental disabilities. Everything seems so overwhelming when you’re new: the evaluations, testing, constant meetings, new policies, learning Common Core standards. So, it was refreshing to attend the VIVA Teachers Talk with Jose Vilson and Melinda Anderson, to hear research and personal experiences from other teachers on the ground going through cycles of reform, all while learning how to teach, and teach well.

The June 14th event, “Race, Class, and Justice in Education,” featured Vilson via video chat (his plane to Chicago was grounded by weather) and Anderson via Twitter @mdawriter. Vilson began by reading excerpts from his book, This is Not a Test, about his first years of teaching and the difficulties he faced being a teacher of color in an urban education setting. He weaves in elements of memoir and research to speak to the pertinent education issues of the day. I listened and related to his story. I know what it’s like to be a young, idealistic, and often lost teacher who’s trying to make a difference with my students. I too am a teacher of color and who knew, at least a bit, what my students were going through. The discussion that followed Vilson’s reading covered a dizzying array of topics related to everything education reform: teacher tenure, especially in the wake of Vergara in California; diversity in our teaching force; Common Core; the influx of teachers through programs such as through Teach For America; and how to incorporate social justice into teaching today.

One key thread through the conversation was about creating trusting relationships between teachers and students — something Vilson said was simply not on the top of the education policy agenda and constantly ignored.

Vilson said we cannot focus so much on building curriculum if we don’t have humanity, trust and camaraderie in teaching. That’s hard to do, especially with everything teachers are juggling.

Race and class complicate and widen this issue of trust. Vilson called it “hair-raising” how few teachers of color — all colors — there are. I am Asian, so I very much related to what he was saying. It’s not something that’s often talked about when we talk about education reform today, but as a student, I know how important it was for me to see people who looked like me. It wasn’t just about representation; it was feeling that I could trust this person, and that this person had lived, at least a little bit, what it meant to be Asian in America. I teach in a predominantly Latino neighborhood in Chicago, so I don’t always look like the kids I teach. This makes me responsible for learning the neighborhood, having good parent relationships, being as open as possible while checking my own biases. Without that trust, openness and honesty, especially with parents, students don’t buy in either.

In my mind, much of the frustration in education today is based on not feeling heard. I know I oftentimes don’t feel heard when I have to administer test after test and complete different paperwork every week, without really understanding why I’m doing such work, and without feeling like I know how to apply this to my teaching. For me, it comes from a top-down approach to education. Both those who provide education services and those who fight for their rights to an education deserve a voice in the conversation.

When teachers feel they have a voice and are heard, they can do wonders. Vilson and others spoke about the importance of treating teachers as professionals, like they know what they’re doing! As Vilson said, schools succeed with teachers of all ages, teachers who are open to new methods, veteran teachers sharing their experiences, not through de-professionalizing education.

I think everything comes down to trust, in all aspects of the education system. From administrators, teachers, principals, students, community members, boards of education, secretaries of education, we need to trust each other in order for us to work together. And we need to put our kids first.

As I saunter around this summer, planning for the upcoming school year, I’m going to focus on my role in advancing social justice in education. Social justice starts from something very basic: hearing from everyone, especially those who aren’t often heard. It’s important to have an anti-testing, anti-corporate movement in education, but it’s also important to make sure those who are at the mercy of such reforms, those who have been and are marginalized, are those who are heard through these conversations. It can be hard for teachers to incorporate that social justice mindset in their classrooms. It can be especially hard as a special education teacher, when most of my students have speech and language impediments due to disabilities. But, I know when my students actually say what they mean, whether through augmentative communication systems, picture cards, one to three word utterances, or scripts and songs, they actually feel invested in building something in the classroom with me. If I’m going to be like Ms. Sheridan or Mrs. Yee, then I have to listen. That’s the way to build critically conscious and aware citizens in our country. And that is how trust is built … one step at a time.

Annie Tan PictureAnnie Tan is a special education teacher in Chicago Public Schools. While building up her teaching, Annie is also working with many other teachers, activists, and community members to fight for voice in Chicago.